It’s not a secret that UK legal usage prefers the spelling judgment (Urteil) and general usage judgement (Urteilsvermögen).
I do sometimes wonder about mixing spellings in one text, but not so Lord Neuberger:
Judgments are the means through which the judges address the litigants and the public at large, and explain their reasons for reaching their conclusions. Judges are required to exercise judgement – and it is clear that without such judgement we would not have a justice system worthy of the name – and they give their individual judgement expression through their Judgments. Without judgement there would be no justice. And without Judgments there would be no justice, because decisions without reasons are certainly not justice: indeed, they are scarcely decisions at all. It is therefore an absolute necessity that Judgments are readily accessible. Such accessibility is part and parcel of what it means for us to ensure that justice is seen to be done, to borrow from Lord Hewart CJ’s famous phrase.
I’m not sure about the capitalization of Judgments.
The source is the first annual BAILII Lecture on 20 November 2012 , No Judgment – No Justice.
Via Binary Law
LATER NOTE: for more detail, commentary and links, see Peter Harvey’s post.